The focus at the eleventh summit
of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) held in
Kathmandu recently was on the fight against terrorism. The Heads of State
and Heads of Government who attended the SAARC summit adopted a
declaration which vowed to fight terrorism in all its forms and
manifestations. The Kathmandu Declaration called for implementation of the
convention adopted by SAARC in 1987 on suppression of terrorism. The
declaration supported the resolution of the UN Security Council on the
need to fight terrorism. It said that terrorism violates the fundamental
values of the United Nations and constitutes one of the most serious
threats to international peace and security in the 21st century. The
leaders of the seven SAARC countries rejected justification of terrorism
on ideological, political, religious or any other ground.
India has been fighting the evil of
terrorism for the last two decades. It was given proof time and again that
terrorist activity, first in Punjab and then in Jammu and Kashmir, was
aided, abetted and planned by Pakistan. One estimate put the number of
people killed by the terrorists at as high as fifty thousand. Most of them
were innocent men, women and children who had nothing to do with politics
and wanted nothing more than to lead a peaceful life.
The western countries like the
United States and Great Britain turned a blind eye as India continued its
grim battle against terrorism planned by its neighbour. India was alone in
the fight. The western countries ignored the massive evidence produced by
India time and again clearly bringing out Pakistan’s hand in terrorism.
The attack on the twin towers of the
World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 in which several thousand lives
were lost, came as a grim reminder to the fact that the evil of terrorism
can strike anywhere on the globe. This made the world form a coalition of
nations against terrorism. The war in Afghanistan and the overthrow of the
Taliban regime there brought no relief to India. Terrorists flushed out of
Afghanistan, found an easy escape route to Jammu and Kashmir through
Pakistan and stepped up their activities there. The battle continues.
India is determined to fight the evil, alone if necessary, to end the
scourge. The attack first on the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly building in
Srinagar on October 1, last year and then on Parliament House in New Delhi
on December 13, last year were clear indications of the increased activity
of the terrorists. The steps taken by India - snapping rail and road
links, banning its air space for Pakistani aircraft and downzing its
diplomatic mission in Islamabad were proof of its determination.
Indians are grateful that, though
belated, the attacks on the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New
York and on the Pentagon have made the United States realise that they can
no longer ignore the threat posed by terrorism not only to normal life or
democracy but to civilisation itself. The Kathmandu Declaration adopted at
the conclusion of the SAARC summit endorsed India’s stand.
Interestingly, the Pakistani President Gen Pervez Musharraf is a signatory
to the declaration and will have to prove his bona fides. The US
President, Mr George W Bush hit the nail on the head when he asked the
Pakistan President ‘to make a clear statement to the world that he
intends to crack down on terror’. The British Prime Minister, Mr Tony
Blair, was even more forthright. He said that incidents like the attack on
the Kashmir Assembly or on the Parliament House in New Delhi had to be
completely condemned before there can be any meaningful dialogue between
India and Pakistan. This is exactly what India has been saying all along.
Unless Pakistan stops aiding militants and terrorists wanting to
destabilise India, there can be no useful dialogue between the two
countries. Mere declarations of banning some organisations, seizing their
funds or putting some persons in prison are not enough. These have to be
backed by a resolve, stated and carried out, to give no aid to terrorists
operating in India or any other country for that matter.
The people of India are not amused
when some leaders of the western countries advise India to be restrained
in their reaction to Pakistan’s actions. This is precisely what India
has been doing for 58 long years in the hope that good sense will dawn
upon Pakistan.
It is true that Pakistan feels that
Kashmir is an issue between the two countries. But cannot this problem be
kept for the time being and avenues searched for cooperation in other
areas? This was agreed to at the Shimla Summit between leaders of the two
countries in 1972. Pakistan has been trying to wriggle out of the
commitment that it made in Shimla. India and Pakistan have fought four
wars over Kashmir and Pakistan must realise for ever that Jammu and
Kashmir is an integral part of India and that India would never agree to
surrender it.
KG Joglekar